ICC passes residential sprinkler resolution

When I was training for active duty fire service, we were taught that there has never been a fatality in a sprinklered residential building when the sprinklers were operational. I don't know if that's still true, but it seems reasonable.

When a new residential structure is being built and the walls and ceilings are open, it's relatively easy to install the proper pipes, sprinkler heads, and controls for the system. I helped build a large custom home last year and the the sprinklers, pipes, and controls, were all installed within a matter of days with very little fuss. The cost was maybe an additional $2 per square foot. Not inexpensive in a large home, but probably the cheapest active automatic fire suppression every invented. The life and property savings are obvious. [Moderator]

The followings from the FireRescue1 newsletter dated September 22, 2008:

ICC passes residential sprinkler resolution

By FireRescue1 Staff

MINNEAPOLIS — Code changes making sprinklers mandatory in new one-family and two-family homes were approved by the International Code Council Sunday.

Ronny Coleman, president of the IRC Fire Sprinkler Coalition, which led the campaign for the resolution to be adopted, called it a "historic moment" in residential fire safety.

"We're now going to move forward at the state and local level to ensure the new code requirement is adopted," he said.

The fire service, home safety advocates and building code officials united to push for a change to the International Residential Code, the model code governing residential construction in 46 states plus the District of Columbia.

Sunday's vote was supported by 73 percent of the voting members in attendance at the final action hearing in Minneapolis — easily surpassing the two-thirds majority required — and mandates fire sprinklers in new single-family homes from the start of 2011.

"Our team worked hard to rally support throughout the United States for a residential fire sprinkler requirement, but our supporters deserve the recognition for showing up en masse in Minneapolis," Coleman said. "They know from experience that sprinklers are the answer to the nation's fire problem."

Proponents had previously come up short in attempts to have a sprinkler resolution passed. At a hearing last year in Rochester, N.Y., a majority of attendees — 56 percent — voted in favor, falling less than 100 votes short of the two-thirds majority needed.

Since that vote, the IRC Fire Sprinkler Coalition has been working to secure more support for its efforts. It now has the backing of more than 100 national, state and local organizations including the IAFC, the IAFF, the NVFC, the National Association of State Fire Marshals and the Home Safety Council.

Have your say in the member comment section

"We are thrilled not only because this moment has taken decades of demanding work to achieve, but because it provides protection for potential victims of future fires," Meri-K Appy, president of the Home Safety Council, said after the vote.

Alan Perdue, the international director of the IAFC's Fire and Life Safety Section, said Sunday's vote "concluded the first monumental step of requiring residential fire sprinklers in the model codes."

However, he warned more work is still to be done.

"It is imperative that we continue our collaborative efforts to protect both the public and our firefighters on the front line by working to make certain that these requirements are also adopted into state and local codes," he said.

About 20 percent of all reported fires occur in one- and two-family structures, causing two-thirds of the fire deaths in the United States.

Despite these statistics, construction groups mounted a concerted campaign against the resolution. Sandra Dunn, president of the National Association of Home Builders, said after the vote, "We disagree with this mandate, but our members will continue to advocate for cost-effective construction and life safety measures through the model code process."

Billy Goldfeder, writing in TheSecretList, said it was no secret that NAHB and its local affiliates went out of their way to try and stop the resolution.

"But the fire service and those with some common sense and understanding beyond profit motivation understood what was the right thing to do," he said.

Residential Sprinklers Now Requirded by ICC Code

When I was training for active duty fire service, we were taught that there has never been a fatality in a sprinklered residential building when the sprinklers were operational. I don't know if that's still true, but it seems reasonable.

When a new residential structure is being built and the walls and ceilings are open, it's relatively easy to install the proper pipes and controls for sprinklers. I helped build a large custom home last year and the the sprinklers, pipes, and controls, were all installed within a matter of days with very little fuss. The cost was maybe an additional $2 per square foot. Not inexpensive in a large home, but probably the cheapest active automatic fire suppression every invented. The life and property savings are obvious. [Moderator]

ICC passes residential sprinkler resolution

By FireRescue1 Staff

Full coverage of the sprinkler resolution debate

MINNEAPOLIS — Code changes making sprinklers mandatory in new one-family and two-family homes were approved by the International Code Council Sunday.

Ronny Coleman, president of the IRC Fire Sprinkler Coalition, which led the campaign for the resolution to be adopted, called it a "historic moment" in residential fire safety.

"We're now going to move forward at the state and local level to ensure the new code requirement is adopted," he said.

The fire service, home safety advocates and building code officials united to push for a change to the International Residential Code, the model code governing residential construction in 46 states plus the District of Columbia.

Sunday's vote was supported by 73 percent of the voting members in attendance at the final action hearing in Minneapolis — easily surpassing the two-thirds majority required — and mandates fire sprinklers in new single-family homes from the start of 2011.

"Our team worked hard to rally support throughout the United States for a residential fire sprinkler requirement, but our supporters deserve the recognition for showing up en masse in Minneapolis," Coleman said. "They know from experience that sprinklers are the answer to the nation's fire problem."

Proponents had previously come up short in attempts to have a sprinkler resolution passed. At a hearing last year in Rochester, N.Y., a majority of attendees — 56 percent — voted in favor, falling less than 100 votes short of the two-thirds majority needed.

Since that vote, the IRC Fire Sprinkler Coalition has been working to secure more support for its efforts. It now has the backing of more than 100 national, state and local organizations including the IAFC, the IAFF, the NVFC, the National Association of State Fire Marshals and the Home Safety Council.

The fire service and those with some common sense and understanding beyond profit motivation understood what was the right thing to do. — Billy Goldfeder, TheSecretList Have your say in the member comment section

"We are thrilled not only because this moment has taken decades of demanding work to achieve, but because it provides protection for potential victims of future fires," Meri-K Appy, president of the Home Safety Council, said after the vote.

Alan Perdue, the international director of the IAFC's Fire and Life Safety Section, said Sunday's vote "concluded the first monumental step of requiring residential fire sprinklers in the model codes."

However, he warned more work is still to be done.

"It is imperative that we continue our collaborative efforts to protect both the public and our firefighters on the front line by working to make certain that these requirements are also adopted into state and local codes," he said.

About 20 percent of all reported fires occur in one- and two-family structures, causing two-thirds of the fire deaths in the United States.

Despite these statistics, construction groups mounted a concerted campaign against the resolution. Sandra Dunn, president of the National Association of Home Builders, said after the vote, "We disagree with this mandate, but our members will continue to advocate for cost-effective construction and life safety measures through the model code process."

Billy Goldfeder, writing in TheSecretList, said it was no secret that NAHB and its local affiliates went out of their way to try and stop the resolution.

"But the fire service and those with some common sense and understanding beyond profit motivation understood what was the right thing to do," he said.